<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did you see Biden pet Sarah Palin?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fairlyconservative.com/2008/10/02/did-you-see-biden-pet-sarah-palin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fairlyconservative.com/2008/10/02/did-you-see-biden-pet-sarah-palin/</link>
	<description>To a sufficient degree; in an evenhanded manner.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 04:53:23 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: J. Strupp</title>
		<link>http://fairlyconservative.com/2008/10/02/did-you-see-biden-pet-sarah-palin/#comment-8952</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Strupp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 03:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairlyconservative.com/?p=1791#comment-8952</guid>
		<description>Grant, 

Your statements suggest that the U.S. government is giving an $850 billion handout.  That&#039;s false.  The government will be purchasing mortgage-backed securities that they can re-sell in the future.  We can go round and round about how much these securities will be worth in the long run but they will be worth something.  My guess (JUST a guess) is somewhere between 40 and 80 cents on the dollar.  Half a trillion dollars is a small price to pay for the long term damage inflicted of our financial system if we do nothing to fix the problem.

I find it ironic that fiscal restraint is all of the sudden an important topic among many conservatives right at the very moment that government spending is so important.  In comparison, our foreign policy blunders over the last two decades make this bill look like pocket change.  

At least we are getting a sizable return on investment in this case AND assisting the American taxpayer at the same time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grant, </p>
<p>Your statements suggest that the U.S. government is giving an $850 billion handout.  That&#8217;s false.  The government will be purchasing mortgage-backed securities that they can re-sell in the future.  We can go round and round about how much these securities will be worth in the long run but they will be worth something.  My guess (JUST a guess) is somewhere between 40 and 80 cents on the dollar.  Half a trillion dollars is a small price to pay for the long term damage inflicted of our financial system if we do nothing to fix the problem.</p>
<p>I find it ironic that fiscal restraint is all of the sudden an important topic among many conservatives right at the very moment that government spending is so important.  In comparison, our foreign policy blunders over the last two decades make this bill look like pocket change.  </p>
<p>At least we are getting a sizable return on investment in this case AND assisting the American taxpayer at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Kilkenny</title>
		<link>http://fairlyconservative.com/2008/10/02/did-you-see-biden-pet-sarah-palin/#comment-8943</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Kilkenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 20:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairlyconservative.com/?p=1791#comment-8943</guid>
		<description>Nothing more than my $4 a month lets you scream your little liberal heart out any time you want. 

It&#039;s getting old, though, listening to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing more than my $4 a month lets you scream your little liberal heart out any time you want. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s getting old, though, listening to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama Mama</title>
		<link>http://fairlyconservative.com/2008/10/02/did-you-see-biden-pet-sarah-palin/#comment-8939</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama Mama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 19:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairlyconservative.com/?p=1791#comment-8939</guid>
		<description>It seemed your first jab had an underlying meaning to it that wrongfully accused me.... that&#039;s all ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seemed your first jab had an underlying meaning to it that wrongfully accused me&#8230;. that&#8217;s all <img src='http://fairlyconservative.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Kilkenny</title>
		<link>http://fairlyconservative.com/2008/10/02/did-you-see-biden-pet-sarah-palin/#comment-8937</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Kilkenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 19:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairlyconservative.com/?p=1791#comment-8937</guid>
		<description>Well, Obama Mama, you&#039;re ignorance is showing.

It&#039;s MY Web site. It&#039;s MY wallet that pays for the hosting that lets you babble at will. It&#039;s MY editorial decision to let you stay.

Apologize for what? Letting you have enough rope?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Obama Mama, you&#8217;re ignorance is showing.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s MY Web site. It&#8217;s MY wallet that pays for the hosting that lets you babble at will. It&#8217;s MY editorial decision to let you stay.</p>
<p>Apologize for what? Letting you have enough rope?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama Mama</title>
		<link>http://fairlyconservative.com/2008/10/02/did-you-see-biden-pet-sarah-palin/#comment-8936</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama Mama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 18:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairlyconservative.com/?p=1791#comment-8936</guid>
		<description>?????????????????????????????????????

&quot;Plus, I gave you the opportunity to embarrass yourself yet again out of the goodness of my own heart (and wallet.) Too bad you can’t put it all into perspective.&quot;

Cindy, I have absolutely no clue what in God&#039;s name you are referring to here. You have never met me, and neither your heart nor wallet has provided me with any &quot;opportunity&quot;... care to elaborate, and apologize????????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>?????????????????????????????????????</p>
<p>&#8220;Plus, I gave you the opportunity to embarrass yourself yet again out of the goodness of my own heart (and wallet.) Too bad you can’t put it all into perspective.&#8221;</p>
<p>Cindy, I have absolutely no clue what in God&#8217;s name you are referring to here. You have never met me, and neither your heart nor wallet has provided me with any &#8220;opportunity&#8221;&#8230; care to elaborate, and apologize????????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Runny Eggs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Morning Scramble - The Glorious And Late Return - 10/3/2008</title>
		<link>http://fairlyconservative.com/2008/10/02/did-you-see-biden-pet-sarah-palin/#comment-8916</link>
		<dc:creator>No Runny Eggs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Morning Scramble - The Glorious And Late Return - 10/3/2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 19:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairlyconservative.com/?p=1791#comment-8916</guid>
		<description>[...] Cindy found a disturbing gesture from Joe Biden at the end of the debate. That would be at the 1:32 mark in the C-SPAN video. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cindy found a disturbing gesture from Joe Biden at the end of the debate. That would be at the 1:32 mark in the C-SPAN video. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy in Richmond</title>
		<link>http://fairlyconservative.com/2008/10/02/did-you-see-biden-pet-sarah-palin/#comment-8913</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy in Richmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairlyconservative.com/?p=1791#comment-8913</guid>
		<description>Strupp
We can allow for mis-speaks. We can overlook exaggeration and fluffery. But I don&#039;t want a Vice President that will look at the camera and America and just intentially flat out tell a lie, that he knows is a lie, to help his guy get elected. When Gov Palin pointed out Obama&#039;s idiotic pledge to meet, without pre-conditions, the leaders of Cuba, Venezuela, N. Korea, Iran, and Syria  Joe Biden did just that. He said, &quot;that&#039;s just simply not true about Barack Obama &quot;.  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSFSUbMWenU

And leadership. Yes, as a committee chairman in Congress  Joe had opportunities to exhibit his leadership before the nation. Did you see the Bork and Thomas confirmation hearings he led--fiasco is too kind a description. But I do agree with you that &quot;he makes a hell of a candidate.&quot;
And Sarah Palin will make a hell of a Vice President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strupp<br />
We can allow for mis-speaks. We can overlook exaggeration and fluffery. But I don&#8217;t want a Vice President that will look at the camera and America and just intentially flat out tell a lie, that he knows is a lie, to help his guy get elected. When Gov Palin pointed out Obama&#8217;s idiotic pledge to meet, without pre-conditions, the leaders of Cuba, Venezuela, N. Korea, Iran, and Syria  Joe Biden did just that. He said, &#8220;that&#8217;s just simply not true about Barack Obama &#8220;.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSFSUbMWenU" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSFSUbMWenU</a></p>
<p>And leadership. Yes, as a committee chairman in Congress  Joe had opportunities to exhibit his leadership before the nation. Did you see the Bork and Thomas confirmation hearings he led&#8211;fiasco is too kind a description. But I do agree with you that &#8220;he makes a hell of a candidate.&#8221;<br />
And Sarah Palin will make a hell of a Vice President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://fairlyconservative.com/2008/10/02/did-you-see-biden-pet-sarah-palin/#comment-8907</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairlyconservative.com/?p=1791#comment-8907</guid>
		<description>&quot;Government is not just printing another $850 billion of debt.&quot;

Well, would you care to explain just exactly where the money is coming from if it&#039;s not debt?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Government is not just printing another $850 billion of debt.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, would you care to explain just exactly where the money is coming from if it&#8217;s not debt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Strupp</title>
		<link>http://fairlyconservative.com/2008/10/02/did-you-see-biden-pet-sarah-palin/#comment-8906</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Strupp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairlyconservative.com/?p=1791#comment-8906</guid>
		<description>Government is not just printing another $850 billion of debt.  The money isn&#039;t just evaporating like it is in the desert heat of Iraq.  

I&#039;m sure we are all familiar with the fundamentals of the bill by now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Government is not just printing another $850 billion of debt.  The money isn&#8217;t just evaporating like it is in the desert heat of Iraq.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure we are all familiar with the fundamentals of the bill by now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://fairlyconservative.com/2008/10/02/did-you-see-biden-pet-sarah-palin/#comment-8900</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairlyconservative.com/?p=1791#comment-8900</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that the Obama lovers have so much emotionally invested in this phony that if McCain/Palin win, they will exhibit more hatred than they have for the last eight years.  I think McCain is making the same BIG mistakes that Bush has made...and that is trying to &quot;make nice&quot; with the people who despise him.  I think it&#039;s better to tell them to &quot;kiss my butt if you don&#039;t like it&quot;.  I think Americans like a fighter rather than a sap.

I don&#039;t like any of these phony senator candidates, and I do like Palin, and I don&#039;t know how I can possibly vote for McCain after he voted &quot;yes&quot; to this new even more pork-laden bailout of Wall Street.  I think they are all lying about the dire straights, and I think Wall Street is making it look worse so they get bailed out and can preserve the riches for themselves.  I say let the chips fall where they may and let the gamblers and deadbeats take their losses.  Once Wall Street realizes that they have to fix the problems or take huge losses, they will move quickly to right the ship.  I believe it&#039;s all another scam of the taxpayers.  Are we so dumb we don&#039;t realize that the government printing another $850 billion of debt is a horrible idea?  Don&#039;t we realize that the government is broke and we are going to end up collapsing financially anytime the oil sheiks and China stop financing us?  Things are bad...but not for the reasons we are told!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that the Obama lovers have so much emotionally invested in this phony that if McCain/Palin win, they will exhibit more hatred than they have for the last eight years.  I think McCain is making the same BIG mistakes that Bush has made&#8230;and that is trying to &#8220;make nice&#8221; with the people who despise him.  I think it&#8217;s better to tell them to &#8220;kiss my butt if you don&#8217;t like it&#8221;.  I think Americans like a fighter rather than a sap.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like any of these phony senator candidates, and I do like Palin, and I don&#8217;t know how I can possibly vote for McCain after he voted &#8220;yes&#8221; to this new even more pork-laden bailout of Wall Street.  I think they are all lying about the dire straights, and I think Wall Street is making it look worse so they get bailed out and can preserve the riches for themselves.  I say let the chips fall where they may and let the gamblers and deadbeats take their losses.  Once Wall Street realizes that they have to fix the problems or take huge losses, they will move quickly to right the ship.  I believe it&#8217;s all another scam of the taxpayers.  Are we so dumb we don&#8217;t realize that the government printing another $850 billion of debt is a horrible idea?  Don&#8217;t we realize that the government is broke and we are going to end up collapsing financially anytime the oil sheiks and China stop financing us?  Things are bad&#8230;but not for the reasons we are told!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
