Comments on: The contaminants leaching from the Brookfield Sanitary Landfill http://fairlyconservative.com/2009/05/21/the-contaminants-leaching-from-the-brookfield-sanitary-landfill/ To a sufficient degree; in an evenhanded manner. Wed, 20 Jan 2010 04:53:23 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: From the outside looking in: bloggers and writers alike watch the Kilkenny lawsuit | Metro Milwaukee Today http://fairlyconservative.com/2009/05/21/the-contaminants-leaching-from-the-brookfield-sanitary-landfill/#comment-15853 From the outside looking in: bloggers and writers alike watch the Kilkenny lawsuit | Metro Milwaukee Today Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:51:49 +0000 http://fairlyconservative.com/?p=4516#comment-15853 [...] soil. She made a remark that indicated that an adjacent property which housed a landfill was leaching off the property. Furthermore, while it wasn’t stated the subdivision’s soil was contaminated, it was [...] [...] soil. She made a remark that indicated that an adjacent property which housed a landfill was leaching off the property. Furthermore, while it wasn’t stated the subdivision’s soil was contaminated, it was [...]

]]> By: Cindy Kilkenny http://fairlyconservative.com/2009/05/21/the-contaminants-leaching-from-the-brookfield-sanitary-landfill/#comment-15753 Cindy Kilkenny Sun, 24 May 2009 19:35:16 +0000 http://fairlyconservative.com/?p=4516#comment-15753 Whew. You had me worried there for a minute. Whew. You had me worried there for a minute.

]]> By: dad29 http://fairlyconservative.com/2009/05/21/the-contaminants-leaching-from-the-brookfield-sanitary-landfill/#comment-15752 dad29 Sun, 24 May 2009 18:04:51 +0000 http://fairlyconservative.com/?p=4516#comment-15752 Ugh. You're correct, although I was certain that Verne Netzow had purchased the Moll farm. Maybe he sold it to Vinnie. And yah, that's the low land. As to driving with me---have a sense of adventure, kid? Whassamaattayou? Too old for wanderings? Ugh. You’re correct, although I was certain that Verne Netzow had purchased the Moll farm. Maybe he sold it to Vinnie.

And yah, that’s the low land.

As to driving with me—have a sense of adventure, kid? Whassamaattayou? Too old for wanderings?

]]> By: Cindy Kilkenny http://fairlyconservative.com/2009/05/21/the-contaminants-leaching-from-the-brookfield-sanitary-landfill/#comment-15750 Cindy Kilkenny Sun, 24 May 2009 03:20:02 +0000 http://fairlyconservative.com/?p=4516#comment-15750 We have a certain reputation to maintain... We have a certain reputation to maintain…

]]> By: Greg Kowalski http://fairlyconservative.com/2009/05/21/the-contaminants-leaching-from-the-brookfield-sanitary-landfill/#comment-15749 Greg Kowalski Sun, 24 May 2009 01:57:41 +0000 http://fairlyconservative.com/?p=4516#comment-15749 Brookfield actually has King Arthur's Court within its city limits. I'm very impressed, Cindy. Brookfield actually has King Arthur’s Court within its city limits. I’m very impressed, Cindy.

]]> By: Cindy Kilkenny http://fairlyconservative.com/2009/05/21/the-contaminants-leaching-from-the-brookfield-sanitary-landfill/#comment-15748 Cindy Kilkenny Sat, 23 May 2009 15:55:39 +0000 http://fairlyconservative.com/?p=4516#comment-15748 Dad29, the mostly horizontal green line is North Avenue. The subdivision with Vincent Ct, etc, is BELOW that green line. When I learned to read maps as a kid, that meant south. But if it makes you feel better, you can call it north. Just remind me never to go anywhere with you as the navigator. Dad29, the mostly horizontal green line is North Avenue. The subdivision with Vincent Ct, etc, is BELOW that green line. When I learned to read maps as a kid, that meant south. But if it makes you feel better, you can call it north.

Just remind me never to go anywhere with you as the navigator.

]]> By: dad29 http://fairlyconservative.com/2009/05/21/the-contaminants-leaching-from-the-brookfield-sanitary-landfill/#comment-15747 dad29 Sat, 23 May 2009 15:14:12 +0000 http://fairlyconservative.com/?p=4516#comment-15747 That's VK's development. NORTH of North Ave., West of Barker--as I posted. That’s VK’s development. NORTH of North Ave., West of Barker–as I posted.

]]> By: Cindy Kilkenny http://fairlyconservative.com/2009/05/21/the-contaminants-leaching-from-the-brookfield-sanitary-landfill/#comment-15743 Cindy Kilkenny Fri, 22 May 2009 20:50:22 +0000 http://fairlyconservative.com/?p=4516#comment-15743 <a href=http://fairlyconservative.com/wp-content/storage/2009/05/southofnorth.jpg rel="nofollow">The right half of this picture</a> is where I was talking about - Carrington Heights. Someone else named Vincent develops in Brookfield? The right half of this picture is where I was talking about – Carrington Heights. Someone else named Vincent develops in Brookfield?

]]> By: dad29 http://fairlyconservative.com/2009/05/21/the-contaminants-leaching-from-the-brookfield-sanitary-landfill/#comment-15742 dad29 Fri, 22 May 2009 19:41:51 +0000 http://fairlyconservative.com/?p=4516#comment-15742 Vince's subdivision is North of North/West of Barker. And it's not low lying land, at least compared to the land SOUTH of North Ave... Odd. Vince’s subdivision is North of North/West of Barker.

And it’s not low lying land, at least compared to the land SOUTH of North Ave…

Odd.

]]> By: Cindy Kilkenny http://fairlyconservative.com/2009/05/21/the-contaminants-leaching-from-the-brookfield-sanitary-landfill/#comment-15735 Cindy Kilkenny Fri, 22 May 2009 12:25:25 +0000 http://fairlyconservative.com/?p=4516#comment-15735 The subdivision I'm thinking of has a "Vincent Drive" and a "Vincent Court" so I'm pretty sure it's a Vince Kuttemperoor wonder. That would make it a Kate Bloomberg problem. The subdivision I’m thinking of has a “Vincent Drive” and a “Vincent Court” so I’m pretty sure it’s a Vince Kuttemperoor wonder. That would make it a Kate Bloomberg problem.

]]>