<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You go Dick Cheney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fairlyconservative.com/2009/05/22/you-go-dick-cheney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fairlyconservative.com/2009/05/22/you-go-dick-cheney/</link>
	<description>To a sufficient degree; in an evenhanded manner.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 23:12:29 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Kilkenny</title>
		<link>http://fairlyconservative.com/2009/05/22/you-go-dick-cheney/#comment-15739</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Kilkenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 13:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairlyconservative.com/?p=4537#comment-15739</guid>
		<description>So now that the Bush policy has a better &quot;face&quot; the media can embrace it as sound policy?

Shallow America. I do fear for our future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So now that the Bush policy has a better &#8220;face&#8221; the media can embrace it as sound policy?</p>
<p>Shallow America. I do fear for our future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn</title>
		<link>http://fairlyconservative.com/2009/05/22/you-go-dick-cheney/#comment-15736</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 12:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairlyconservative.com/?p=4537#comment-15736</guid>
		<description>David Brooks argues this morning that Cheney is alone in that because he was alone in that for the past five years.  He says that Obama policy is Bush policy with a better face on it.  Not sure I buy that, but it does intrigue and it is oddly comforting.  Missing from the column is W himself, as if all this went on while he was down with the flu or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Brooks argues this morning that Cheney is alone in that because he was alone in that for the past five years.  He says that Obama policy is Bush policy with a better face on it.  Not sure I buy that, but it does intrigue and it is oddly comforting.  Missing from the column is W himself, as if all this went on while he was down with the flu or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
